I don't understand this

[Herbert Voss]

Am 13.06.23 um 01:30 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck:
> On 6/12/23 16:08, Herbert Voss wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 12.06.23 um 21:49 schrieb Udicoudco:
>>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 8:32 PM Herbert Voss 
>>> <Herbert.Voss at fu-berlin.de> wrote:
>>>> No, because unicode-math loads amsmath by default which defines 
>>>> \mathbb
>>> \mathbb isn't defined in amsmath, but in amsfonts, which should not 
>>> be used
>>> with unicode-math (and as a consequence, neither amssymb should be used
>>> with unicode-math).
>>
>>
>> sure ...
>> If you _only_ load unicode-math the \mathbb is defined.
>
> So, Herbert, let me ask: Is there anything we can really do here to 
> help the user? Or is this just how things are? I've gotten used to it, 
> but it is a bit annoying.

 From TeX's view you can use any command for a special character.
If that character is part of LyX's  currently defined display font _and_
defined in the current TeX font are two other questions. And, from
my point of view, totally user specific ...

Herbert