Bibliographic citations citation style formatting

[Rich Shepard]

On Wed, 12 Jul 2023, Rich Shepard wrote:

> Here's a different one from a report written a couple of months ago. See
> second attachment (citation-style.png). Notice that the citation is a pair
> of question marks (and all variants of that are the only display options)
> while the citation (Langless2000) is what should be displayed.

Fixed this one. While the Settings dialog box showed the authoryear, it was
not in the list of authors. Scrolling down that list I clicked on that name
and the proper entry was loaded. The LyX and PDF files are correct.

However, ... there are still bibliography errors that can be seen in the
mwe.lyx file (attached, along with a mwe.bib containing two entries).

Creating the new file (KOMA-Sctipt book class), the bibliography setting is
stuck at bibtex, not biblatex. I need to fix this for the MWE and future new
docs. It also presents only bibtex citation styles, not the biblatex ones.

I need help setting biblatex as the default for all book and report docs and
having all multi-author docs (3 or more authors) display citations and
bibliography entrries as the first author + et al.

Now to read TLC3/II on biblatex.

TIA,

Rich
-------------- next part --------------
#LyX 2.3 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
\lyxformat 544
\begin_document
\begin_header
\save_transient_properties true
\origin unavailable
\textclass scrbook
\begin_preamble
\date{}
\usepackage{mathpazo,amssymb}
\usepackage{graphicx,relsize}
\usepackage{scrlayer-scrpage}
\pagestyle{scrheadings}
\makeatletter
\@addtoreset{figure}{subsection}% Reset figure numbering at every part
\makeatother
\end_preamble
\use_default_options true
\begin_modules
natbibapa
\end_modules
\maintain_unincluded_children false
\language english
\language_package default
\inputencoding default
\fontencoding global
\font_roman "palatino" "default"
\font_sans "avant" "default"
\font_typewriter "courier" "default"
\font_math "auto" "auto"
\font_default_family rmdefault
\use_non_tex_fonts false
\font_sc true
\font_osf false
\font_sf_scale 100 100
\font_tt_scale 100 100
\use_microtype false
\use_dash_ligatures false
\graphics default
\default_output_format default
\output_sync 0
\bibtex_command biber
\index_command default
\paperfontsize default
\spacing single
\use_hyperref false
\papersize custom
\use_geometry true
\use_package amsmath 1
\use_package amssymb 1
\use_package cancel 0
\use_package esint 0
\use_package mathdots 1
\use_package mathtools 0
\use_package mhchem 1
\use_package stackrel 0
\use_package stmaryrd 0
\use_package undertilde 0
\cite_engine natbib
\cite_engine_type authoryear
\biblio_style authordate4
\use_bibtopic false
\use_indices false
\paperorientation portrait
\suppress_date false
\justification true
\use_refstyle 0
\use_minted 0
\index Index
\shortcut idx
\color #008000
\end_index
\paperwidth 6in
\paperheight 9in
\leftmargin 0.75in
\topmargin 0.9in
\rightmargin 0.75in
\bottommargin 0.9in
\secnumdepth 2
\tocdepth 2
\paragraph_separation indent
\paragraph_indentation default
\is_math_indent 0
\math_numbering_side default
\quotes_style english
\dynamic_quotes 0
\papercolumns 1
\papersides 2
\paperpagestyle default
\tracking_changes false
\output_changes false
\html_math_output 0
\html_css_as_file 0
\html_be_strict false
\end_header

\begin_body

\begin_layout Enumerate
assessment of streams and rivers for determining whether designated beneficial
 uses have been attained, for measurements of biodiversity, or for quantifying
 ecosystem function (
\begin_inset CommandInset citation
LatexCommand cite
key "Doledec2000"
literal "false"

\end_inset

, 
\begin_inset CommandInset citation
LatexCommand cite
key "Resh2005"
literal "false"

\end_inset

, 
\begin_inset CommandInset citation
LatexCommand cite
key "Chessman2007"
literal "false"

\end_inset

, 
\begin_inset CommandInset citation
LatexCommand cite
key "Cuffney2007"
literal "false"

\end_inset

.) In addition to mixed taxonomic levels being given the same weight in a
 diversity or integrity index, these metrics do not accommodate the range
 of benthic macroinvertebrate life history strategies.
 These life history differences mean that taxa collected at any site depends
 on the collection date (
\begin_inset CommandInset citation
LatexCommand cite
key "Lenat1988"
literal "false"

\end_inset

, 
\begin_inset CommandInset citation
LatexCommand cite
key "Clarke2002"
literal "false"

\end_inset

, 
\begin_inset CommandInset citation
LatexCommand cite
key "Bruce2002"
literal "false"

\end_inset

, 
\begin_inset CommandInset citation
LatexCommand cite
key "Boyero2005"
literal "false"

\end_inset

, 
\begin_inset CommandInset citation
LatexCommand cite
key "Bogan2007"
literal "false"

\end_inset

.) For example, at one extreme are the terrestrial locusts, the swarming
 phase of certain species of short-horned
\begin_inset CommandInset bibtex
LatexCommand bibtex
btprint "btPrintCited"
bibfiles "/home/rshepard/documents/mwe"
options "aunsnot"

\end_inset


\end_layout

\end_body
\end_document
-------------- next part --------------
% Encoding: UTF-8
@comment{x-kbibtex-encoding=utf-8}

@comment{ This file was created with JabRef 2.9.2.
}

@article{Doledec2000,
	abstract = {Studies of biodiverstiy and ecosystem function require to
                  consider the identification level that accurately describes
                  the functional diversity of comminities, in terms of their
                  biological traits, and different spatial scales. Therefore,
                  we combined three published data sets of stream
                  macroinvertebrate abundances collected at three spatial
                  scales with a database of funcional species traits (e.g.,
                  life history, morphology, physiology, and benavior). We
                  investigated the abundance of taxa and their traits at five
                  levels of taxonomic (from species to class) and three levels
                  of spatial resolution (from local habitat to catchment). We
                  used multivariate analyses and correlations to evaluate the
                  accuracy of community descriptions through the stability of
                  such descriptions, the degree of similarity of site
                  ordinations, and the overall community structure expressed
                  at each taxonomic level. The accuracy of community
                  descriptions based on the abundance of taxa depended on the
                  spatial scale considered. The accurate description of the
                  abundance of taxa required identification to genera and/or
                  families on the local habitat scale, while species
                  idenfifications were needed on the catchment scales. Thus,
                  species identifications may not be necessary for future
                  studies on the functional diversity of the stream benthos at
                  different spatial scales.},
	author = {Doledec, S. and Olivier, J.M. and Statzner, B.},
	journal = {Archiv fur Hydrobiologie},
	keywords = {streams, rivers, macroinvertebrates, benthos, biodiversity, ecosystem function, spatial, statistics, models, taxonomy, Life history, sampling, functional feeding groups},
	number = {1},
	pages = {25?43},
	title = {{Accurate description of the abundance of taxa and their biological traits in stream invertebrate communities: effects of texonomic and spatial resolution.}},
	volume = {148},
	year = {2000}
}

@article{Clarke2002,
	abstract = {1. The EC Water Framework Directive (2000 / 60 / EC)
                  recognises the need for biological monitoring. Indices
                  derived from standard samples of macroinvertebrates are
                  frequently used for the appraisal of the ecological quality
                  of rivers. However, information on the errors or chance
                  variation that can influence the value of an index is also
                  important. 2. This paper describes a study to quantify the
                  observed sampling variation in three ecological indices
                  based on the Biological Monitoring Working Party (BMWP)
                  score system across a wide range of river types and
                  qualities. The indices are number of BMWP taxa, BMWP score
                  and Average Score Per Taxon (ASPT). 3. The study sites were
                  selected to encompass the four major groups within the River
                  InVertebrate Prediction And Classification System (RIVPACS)
                  site classification for Britain. Within each group, four
                  sites which differed in ecological quality grade were chosen
                  (total of 16 sites). At each site three standard RIVPACS
                  samples were taken in each of spring, summer and autumn by
                  trained staff. In each season, two samples were taken by one
                  biologist and the third by a different individual to allow
                  for within and between-operator variation. 4. The effects of
                  sampling variation within a season on the number of taxa,
                  BMWP score and ASPT across all sites, irrespective of
                  operator, could be represented by some simple parameters. We
                  found that the sampling SD of the square root of the number
                  of taxa, square root of BMWP score and the untransformed
                  ASPT were roughly constant in each case, irrespective of
                  site type or quality. For each index, SD for two and three
                  seasons combined samples were smaller than for single season
                  samples. 5. Inter-operator influences on sample values were
                  negligible (4??12\% of total sampling SD) in this study.
                  This underlines the importance of adequate training for all
                  staff involved in extensive monitoring programmes which use
                  standard procedures from one year to the next, but may
                  involve different staff. 6. Indices for number of taxa, BMWP
                  score and ASPT were all estimated with greater precision
                  from combined season samples than from the averages of two
                  or three seasons' samples. 7. This study enables us to
                  estimate confidence intervals for the values of the number
                  of taxa, BMWP score and ASPT based on single season, two or
                  three season combined samples collected using standard
                  RIVPACS procedures for any river site in Britain. The
                  results can also be used in simulation models which
                  incorporate the effects of sampling variation into
                  assessments of the ecological quality of river sites based
                  on the ratio of observed to RIVPACS expected values of these
                  BMWP indices.},
	author = {Clarke, R.T. and Furse, M.T. and Gunn, R.J.M. and Winder, J.M. and Wright, J.F.},
	journal = {Freshwater Biology},
	keywords = {streams, rivers, benthos, macroinvertebrates, RIVPACS, bioassessment, sampling, models, statistics},
	pages = {1735?1751},
	title = {{Sampling variation in macroinvertebrate data and implications for river quality indices}},
	volume = {47},
	year = {2002}
}