Solved and addendum >Re: biblatex-spbasic

[Wolfgang Engelmann]

Am 14.03.22 um 08:59 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann via lyx-users:
> 
> 
> Am 14.03.22 um 08:33 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann via lyx-users:
>>
>>
>> Am 14.03.22 um 08:10 schrieb Herbert Voss via lyx-users:
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 14.03.22 um 08:07 schrieb Herbert Voss via lyx-users:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 14.03.22 um 07:58 schrieb Herbert Voss via lyx-users:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 14.03.22 um 07:53 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann via lyx-users:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 14.03.22 um 07:51 schrieb Herbert Voss via lyx-users:
>>>>>>> Am 14.03.22 um 07:47 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann via lyx-users:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Example:
>>>>>>>>>> was shown by Muller^7 and ...
>>>>>>>>>> The Bibliography shows the full reference Muller...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This _is_ \footcite{key} with a short reference as footnote and 
>>>>>>>>> bib as usual.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Herbert
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I meant ONLY the ^7, WITHOUT the footnote
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> then you also need a bibliography in numeric style. But spbasic has
>>>>>>> a bib in author-year-style
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Herbert
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What would be the next best numeric style to spbasic ?
>>>>>
>>>>> there is no best, it is the default  style "numeric" with changing 
>>>>> \cite
>>>>> to footnotes.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You can try "style=nature"   instead of footnotes
>>>
>>>
>>> sorry, read "instead of numeric"
>>>
>>> Herbert
>>
>> Thanks, Herbert, for the proposals. I Will take the Nature style.
>>
>> Wolfgang
> 
> I selected biblatex citation style Nature and kept biblatex-spbasic for 
> the bibliography style. The citations are now in [number], but that's ok.
> Thanks, Herbert, for the suggestion.
> 
> Wolfgang

Addendum:

This is of course nonsense:

"I selected biblatex citation style Nature and kept biblatex-spbasic for
 > the bibliography style."

I can't keep biblatex-spbasic, since it is not numeric.
The bibliography style should also be Nature

Wolfgang