Weird compile result -- bug?
Rich Shepard
rshepard at appl-ecosys.com
Fri Oct 15 16:40:00 UTC 2021
On Fri, 15 Oct 2021, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> So I went to the original document and, in the bibliography settings,
> changed the processor option from default to bibtex8, and sure enough the
> original compiled correctly.
>
> I'm not sure if this is a bug or something the user is responsible for
> knowing (it was news to me, but I never use biblatex). So I'm reporting it
> here to let wiser minds decide.
Paul,
Thanks for digging further into the issue. I clarify a couple of points
because I think the problem is a bug, not a "feature." :-)
Biblatex replaced bibtxt a number of years ago, and the application which
works on biblatex-formatted bibliographic databases is Biber.
In my document the Settings -> Bibliography -> Bibliography Generator
Processer is set to biber.
I'm not sure what bibtex8 does, but biblatex and biber are a mated pair.
Carpe weekend,
Rich
More information about the lyx-users
mailing list