Currently working on a patch to address deprecations that trigger -Werror with Qt 5.14.1
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
lasgouttes at lyx.org
Fri Mar 20 14:08:20 UTC 2020
Le 20/03/2020 à 14:49, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>> I would say that we don't care, so width() is better since is is shorter and
>> easier to understand :)
>
> Just to double-check: By width() you mean boundingRect().width(), and
yes
> you are saying it is shorter than horizontalAdvance() because we do not
> have to condition on the Qt version, right? I agree that
> boundingRect().width() is easier to understand than horizontalAdvance().
To be frank, I forgot about Qt version. My point was more about code
being easier to understand. I had to read the docs to understand what
the meaning of "horizontal advance" could be.
JMarc
More information about the lyx-devel
mailing list