On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 07:23:52PM +0100, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: > >This is what I initially thought, but no k+m+2 is still ok because we > >check against < MAX_WD_LEN-1 not <= MAX_WD_LEN-1. > > I patched and recompiled, same warning as expected from the last posts. Yes, the warning won't go away, but it's not a problem here. Pavel