LyX 2.3.4 is Released

[Jean-Pierre Chrétien]

Le 06/02/2020 à 18:16, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 06:01:26PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 05:46:57PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 04:02:34PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 12:59:53PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>>>>> I looked at the code and the buffer length seems properly handled in the reported
>>>>> line (247) by the previous if clause.
>>>>> What is not clear to me are two following lines, which add m+1 chars while the
>>>>> check seem to properly handle only m chars and leaving no place for the final' \0'.
>>>>> Anyone else can confirm?
>>>>
>>>> I think the code is correct. It copies m+1 chars in order to be sure that
>>>> the final '\0' is also copied. The fact that there is space for it is
>>>> assured by the initial check that k+m+1 < MAX_WD_LEN.
>>>
>>> I checked the code again and you are right.
>>> Misread < (by <=) in the initial condition.
>>
>> On second thought, I instead think you are right. The code also adds
>> a blank after the first strncpy(dfn,pos,k), and that makes a total
>> of k+m+2 chars when accounting also for the final '\0'.
> 
> This is what I initially thought, but no k+m+2 is still ok because we
> check against < MAX_WD_LEN-1 not <= MAX_WD_LEN-1.

I patched and recompiled, same warning  as expected from the last posts.

-- 
Jean-Pierre