metainfo and cmake

[Kornel Benko]

Am Fri, 6 Oct 2023 12:30:53 +0200
schrieb Cor Blom <cornelisbb at gmail.com>:

> Op 06-10-2023 om 12:14 schreef Kornel Benko:
> > Am Fri, 06 Oct 2023 10:53:25 +0100
> > schrieb José Matos <jaomatos at gmail.com>:
> >   
> >> On Fri, 2023-10-06 at 11:09 +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:  
> >>> Should we rename this file on install to be able to install multiple
> >>> lyx-versions?
> >>> Like "org.lyx.LyX.metainfo.xml" -> "LyX2.4.metainfo.xml"
> >>> if using versioned suffixes?
> >>>
> >>> 	Kornel  
> >>
> >> Using my blue hat here (Fedora). :-)
> >>
> >> Although I am not using cmake (yet!) I prefer to have the simple
> >> version. When I need to take care of another version I prefer to do it
> >> myself.
> >>
> >> Looking into the system directory (/usr/share/metainfo/) I do not see
> >> any versioned file.
> >>
> >> My two ¢.  
> > 
> > I am using lyx2.3 and lyx2.4 in parallel installed. The problem will arise on
> > installing lyx2.5 later.
> > 
> > Installing without using the suffix should be no problem for you (e.g. no change)
> > My proposal would rename it to "LyX.metainfo.xml".
> >   
> 
> This conflict is, I believe, also present in autoconf builds. The 
> default there is to build without suffix. If I move to cmake for 
> openSUSE packages, it's very likely I will continue to build without suffix.
> 
> Cor
> 

Sure, good for you. But not for my use case.

	Kornel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.lyx.org/pipermail/lyx-devel/attachments/20231006/71c777b8/attachment.asc>