flatpak

[T Rex]

Since my use of lyx is not very advanced, I had not worried about that. You
are right, regarding the characteristics you mention, I think that their
incorporation should not present any problems, it will only slightly
inflate the package that is currently 30M for my system without obviously
having the environment with texlive.



El mar, 28 nov 2023 a la(s) 07:20, T Rex (sixpalax at gmail.com) escribió:

> I think it builds satisfactorily, if you want to try:
>
> flatpak install --user https://dl.flathub.org/build-repo/66570/org.lyx.LyX.flatpakref
> I remain attentive to suggestions.
> On the other hand, is there anyone who would like to have write permissions for the repository on github to mention it?@jakobjakobson13 seems to be more aware of the progress of the project, I suppose he is the right person to handle the issue of updates.
> This is the petition page,
>
> https://github.com/flathub/flathub/pull/4730
>
>
> El dom, 26 nov 2023 a la(s) 10:47, T Rex (sixpalax at gmail.com) escribió:
>
>> In fact, I am doing a more exhaustive search, but I think one of the
>> problems is that the configuration avoids making system calls to open a
>> file because in the system scan it did not find a program that could manage
>> it.
>>
>> El sáb, 25 nov 2023 a la(s) 23:48, Richard Kimberly Heck (
>> rikiheck at gmail.com) escribió:
>>
>>> On 11/25/23 23:03, T Rex wrote:
>>>
>>> I have sent the add request to flathub. The compilations I have made
>>> have been successful, however I have had to make some unexpected maneuvers
>>> to allow the program to function correctly, such as editing lyxrc.defaults. I
>>> don't know if there is a better way. Without the modification the
>>> buttons to build and view are blocked.
>>> Here you can find the manifest and other files:
>>> https://github.com/bztd/flathub/tree/org.lyx.LyX
>>> I remain attentive to any ideas, suggestions or opinions.
>>>
>>> It's fine to edit lyxrc.defaults, I think. This is basically a normal
>>> thing for distributions to do, though there may be some better way to do
>>> it. Perhaps someone else will know.
>>>
>>> What changes did you make, out of curiosity?
>>>
>>> Riki
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> El vie, 24 nov 2023 a la(s) 13:33, T Rex (sixpalax at gmail.com) escribió:
>>>
>>>> Ready, thank you very much for the prompt response, when I have a
>>>> functional version I will submit the request and I will send the links if I
>>>> am successful.
>>>>
>>>> El vie, 24 nov 2023 a la(s) 13:27, Richard Kimberly Heck (
>>>> rikiheck at gmail.com) escribió:
>>>>
>>>>> On 11/24/23 11:15, T Rex wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> good day everyone, my apologies in advance if this is not the correct
>>>>> channel to do the following: as Lyx is not available on flathub, I would
>>>>> like to create the manifest so that it is available there, in any case the
>>>>> original sources are used, is there any Problem with performing that
>>>>> action?
>>>>>
>>>>> First, the GPL license surely allows it, so long as you make the
>>>>> source code available (which is obviously not a problem). Second, I can't
>>>>> imagine that any of us would object. Indeed, if you do go ahead, please
>>>>> send us the link, so we can add it to the download section of our website.
>>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps we should even include the manifest in our git codebase
>>>>> somewhere? That would need a bit more discussion.
>>>>>
>>>>> Riki
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> --
>>> ----------------------------
>>> Richard Kimberly (Riki) Heck
>>> Professor of Philosophy
>>> Brown University
>>>
>>> Pronouns: they/them/their
>>> Website:  http://rkheck.frege.org/
>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lyx.org/pipermail/lyx-devel/attachments/20231128/362e766a/attachment.html>