Using lyxhtml_validity.py

[Thibaut Cuvelier]

On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 at 17:29, Scott Kostyshak <skostysh at lyx.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 06:55:11AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Wed, 11 Jan 2023 01:12:40 +0100
> > schrieb Thibaut Cuvelier <dourouc05 at gmail.com>:
> >
> > > > Still
> > > >         Error: Bad value "content-type" for attribute "http-equiv"
> on element "meta".
> > > >
> > > > Should we ignore this error?
> > > >
> > > I don't think we should ignore it. It really seems to be
> platform-dependent (either due
> > > to LyX or the HTML validator). I really can't reproduce locally, even
> when running the
> > > test through CTest (log attached for Intro.lyx). However, when
> uploading my file to
> > > https://validator.nu/#file, I get the error message.
> >
> > I suppose the call to validate is still commented out in your
> export.cmake?
> > I have now enabled the call at 88087a3c, now that the test passes here
> too. Thanks for
> > your work.
>
> Thanks to both of you on making progress on these tests. Still a lot of
> tests fail for me. Is it OK to comment out the check_xhtml_validate()
> line until the tests are passing for all of us? Otherwise it's hard for
> me to figure out which failures are due to regressions.
>

It's totally OK: I won't have time to work on all these issues in time for
LyX 2.4. Some of them are rather deep (like <div> being generated at the
wrong place).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lyx.org/pipermail/lyx-devel/attachments/20230115/8f714960/attachment.html>