Depth in/decrease used as equivalent to outline in/out

[José Abílio Matos]

On Tuesday, 1 February 2022 14.33.49 WET Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Note that shift-tab for depth does not always have a local scope either,
> since it may change the depth of nested sub elements.

Yes, I know and it was a sloppy language. :-)

A better expression would be a waterfall model and so it would be waterfall 
scope. :-)

In the worst case it can topple until the end but it behaves differently from 
what it does now.

1. A
1.1 B
1.1.1 C
1.1.1.1 D

It goes to

1. A
2. B
2.1 C
2.1.1 D

-- 
José Abílio