Fwd: [Review requested] New DocBook layout parameter

[Richard Kimberly Heck]

On 12/26/22 20:01, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote:
>
> Riki, let me know :)!

In another email, I said:

I am planning to do the tarball tomorrow, so I guess the question is 
whether these changes can be *completed* by then. Since they don't 
affect really core code, I'm not too worried about them being mature yet.

So if you think this is really done, go ahead. If you're not sure, then 
let's wait.


> I'm attaching a new version of the patch with the updated 
> layout2layout script (including a change for layout version 98 that 
> was skipped, if I understand correctly). There is also a second patch 
> that updates the layouts.

That's a bit confusing. You just need to handle up to format 98. It's 
the OLD format number that's being tested in those conditions. So you 
want if 87 <= format <= 98.

That said, are we sure there's nothing to do here? Suppose someone has a 
custom layout for some remark-like construction. Do we just want to 
leave that as is?

Riki




-- 
----------------------------
Richard Kimberly (Riki) Heck
Professor of Philosophy
Brown University

Pronouns: they/them/their

Website:http://rkheck.frege.org/
Blog:http://rikiheck.blogspot.com/
Amazon:http://amazon.com/author/richardgheckjr
Google Scholar:https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=QUKBG6EAAAAJ
ORCID:http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2961-2663
Research Gate:https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Richard_Heck
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lyx.org/pipermail/lyx-devel/attachments/20221226/4b571756/attachment.html>