XHTML ctests failing

Richard Kimberly Heck rikiheck at gmail.com
Mon Dec 26 20:44:39 UTC 2022


On 12/26/22 15:01, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Dec 2022 at 20:56, Kornel Benko <kornel at lyx.org> wrote:
>
>     Am Mon, 26 Dec 2022 19:21:48 +0100
>     schrieb Thibaut Cuvelier <dourouc05 at gmail.com>:
>
>     > On Mon, 26 Dec 2022 at 09:51, Kornel Benko <kornel at lyx.org> wrote:
>     >
>     > > Am Mon, 26 Dec 2022 01:52:50 -0500
>     > > schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skostysh at lyx.org>:
>     > >
>     > > > A lot of the XHTML ctests just started failing.
>     > > >
>     > > > Are they passing for others?
>     > > >
>     > > > Scott
>     > >
>     > > Same here.
>     > > 69% tests passed, 129 tests failed out of 422
>     > >
>     >
>     > I've just pushed 21d1d917ba to fix a lot of failures (at least
>     locally).
>     > I'm still running the complete test suite to ensure that there
>     is no other
>     > failure :).
>
>     Thanks a lot.
>
>     100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 422
>
>
> I've done a new pass over MathML and XHTML code to remove a few more 
> HTML entities that were left (&XXX; where XXX is not a number, amp, 
> lt, gt). I don't think any others remain, but they might cause similar 
> issues if a test case starts exercising those code paths (in case it 
> helps for future failures).

This is proof of how useful these tests are. Thanks to Kornel and Scott 
for maintaining them.

Riki

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lyx.org/pipermail/lyx-devel/attachments/20221226/9309828d/attachment.html>


More information about the lyx-devel mailing list