[LyX/master] Meet per-document spelling dictionaries (fixes #86 [sic!])
Stephan Witt
st.witt at gmx.net
Mon Mar 8 20:29:57 UTC 2021
Am 08.03.2021 um 19:39 schrieb Stephan Witt <st.witt at gmx.net>:
>
> Am 08.03.2021 um 19:22 schrieb Stephan Witt <st.witt at gmx.net>:
>>
>> Am 08.03.2021 um 14:32 schrieb Pavel Sanda <sanda at lyx.org>:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 01:14:12PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
>>>>> Are you sure you did not errorneously flagged one of bisect steps wrongly?
>>>>
>>>> My HEAD is ahead of origin by 4 commits (including the manual reversion - diff attached).
>>>
>>> 07122f066b43 and your reversion is not identical - I see several changes in exception includes.
>>> What happens if you actually revert 07122f066b43 verbatim?
>>
>> The same. :(
>> Attached is the revert patch I’ve used to test.
>
> To come closer to the original I've moved the location of the spellignore()
> retrieval (patch attached). Same exception.
>
> Please consider the fact that I check the spelling of the german Intro.lyx.
>
> The bparams.spellignore() word list should be empty and it is.
>
> The basic_string exception must be independent and more general.
Finally I got it. Sorry for the noise and thank you for your patience.
The change 6273c1f66d fixes it.
I couldn’t imagine the exception ruins the stack trace completely.
Stephan
More information about the lyx-devel
mailing list