[LyX/master] Tab binding: outline-in before depth-increment

Scott Kostyshak skostysh at lyx.org
Sat Jan 9 17:07:06 UTC 2021

On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 09:06:56AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Freitag, dem 08.01.2021 um 20:32 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > It would be nice to get someone else's feedback (Jürgen?) before you
> > work on it. I see a few possibilities:
> > 
> > 1. A tag that does not allow layouts to nest other layouts of the
> > same
> >    type.
> > 
> > 2. A tag that does not allow a layout to be nested at all.
> > 
> > 3. A tag that is similar to the "AutoNests" tag, where we can list
> > all
> >    of the layouts that a layout should not nest (or should not be
> > nested by?).
> > 
> > (3) is the most general so my initial guess is that's the way to go.
> > I
> > like your name for the tag that you proposed earlier,
> > ProhibitNesting.
> NeverNestedBy with "none" indicating a layout cannot be nested at all?
> The analog function is AutoNestedBy (not AutoNests), and I suppose most
> of the code can just be copied.

That name is fine with me. I think I slightly prefer the sound of
"ProhibitNestingBy". I guess "NeverNestedBy" is more a property of the
underlying LaTeX mechanism (e.g., "a section is never nested in another
section") and "ProhibitNestingBy" is more a property of LyX's layout
feature (e.g., "LyX will prohibit the user from nesting a section in
another section"). I'm not familiar with the layout code, so whatever
you and Riki think is more consistent is fine with me.

Also, it takes me a little while to parse "never nested by none", but
would it make more sense for "never nested by *all*" to mean a layout
that cannot be nested at all?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.lyx.org/pipermail/lyx-devel/attachments/20210109/cc0b8ed4/attachment.asc>

More information about the lyx-devel mailing list