LyX 2.4.0

[Richard Kimberly Heck]

On 12/6/21 22:00, Daniel wrote:
> On 2021-12-06 22:58, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>>> Do you mean by "safe enough to include" that they should be more or 
>>> less done? For example, there were a couple of tickets where you 
>>> said that you take a look at while there were things that needed to 
>>> be done still. I take it that this is not going to happen, right?
>>
>> Safe as in: Not likely to cause bugs we need to solve before the 
>> release. Once we hit beta, we are in bug-fixing mode, and the fewer 
>> the better.
>>
>> Riki
>
> Okay. (Though it is not what I have expected beta to be. I would have 
> thought that software in beta is actually "likely" to have bug rather 
> than unlikely. I would have thought the latter is release candidate.)

Well, we know beta will have bugs---indeed, we know of some 
already---but the idea is that we do our best not to create new bugs at 
that point. New features bring new bugs. That's why beta release goes 
with feature freeze.

That said, at the moment we're talking about what will make it into 
beta, so some risk is all right.

Riki