LyX 2.4.0
Daniel
xracoonx at gmx.de
Sun Dec 5 17:47:12 UTC 2021
On 05/12/2021 18:37, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> On 12/2/21 02:42, Daniel wrote:
>> On 2021-12-02 07:52, Daniel wrote:
>>> On 2021-12-01 22:48, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>>>> Hi, all,
>>>>
>>>> Things got a bit crazy again, but I now should have a bit of time.
>>>> Where do people think we stand with 2.4.0? I've seen a bit of
>>>> activity in the interim. Do we need to do one more alpha? Or should
>>>> we proceed directly to beta 1?
>>>>
>>>> What if anything needs to be done before we move to whatever the
>>>> next stage is?
>>>>
>>>> Riki
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Here is a list of enhancements with patches targeted to 2.4.0. Many
>>> of them do not involve file format changes, so I guess they could
>>> wait. Unfortunately, I am not always sure whether a patch involves a
>>> format change or not. Maybe someone could check to be sure?
>>>
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>
>> And here is the actual list:
>> https://www.lyx.org/trac/query?status=accepted&status=assigned&status=new&status=reopened&description=~&reporter=~&summary=~&milestone=2.4.0&keywords=~patch&type=enhancement&col=id&col=summary&col=reporter&col=status&col=type&col=severity&col=keywords&desc=1&order=id
>>
>
> If things do not require format changes, they can always go into 2.4.x
> somewhere along the way.
>
> Riki
Sure. But a couple on the list have the "fileformat" keyword. And some
of mine might require a format change while others might not because I
am not sure enough whether a format change is needed.
Daniel
More information about the lyx-devel
mailing list