DocBook v2

[Thibaut Cuvelier]

On Sat, 12 Sep 2020 at 16:28, Kornel Benko <kornel at lyx.org> wrote:

> Am Sat, 12 Sep 2020 16:07:39 +0200
> schrieb Thibaut Cuvelier <tcuvelier at lyx.org>:
>
> > On Sat, 12 Sep 2020 at 07:38, Scott Kostyshak <skostysh at lyx.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 02:04:31PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > >
> > > > >> By the way, what would you prefer I do in this
> > > > > > case where I'm not sure the fix is correct? Since we're on a
> branch,
> > > I
> > > > > > just committed so that way the tests work for me and Kornel (who
> I
> > > > > > imagine is also affected by this configure issue). But if you
> prefer
> > > I
> > > > > > post the patch to the list instead of pushing, that's fine too.
> In my
> > > > > > opinion, since it's your branch you should choose the workflow.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >  I have no problem with you pushing commits onto that branch. Just
> make
> > > > > sure to send the hash on the list, in case I make one force push
> too
> > > many
> > > > > :).
> > > >
> > > > Sounds good! I will try to remember to always specify the hash
> (please
> > > > let me know if I forget).
> > >
> > > I just pushed commit 7dc72ef3, which cherry-picked a commit from master
> > > that fixes a path in an ru example file. After this, all docbook tests
> > > pass for me.
> > >
> > > I get a lot of failures from the xhtml tests. I think most of these
> > > failures are due to xmllint not being happy. I can give you the log
> that
> > > has these errors (and xmllint output) if that would be helpful.
> > > Otherwise, would it just be better to disable xmllint checking in the
> > > tests for now? If not, it seems we will have a lot of test failures and
> > > it will be difficult to catch more serious regressions (e.g., crashes).
> > > That said, I don't know anything about this stuff so whatever you and
> > > Kornel prefer is fine with me.
> > >
> >
> > Kornel (in CC) said somewhere else he'd prefer to wait before merging
> > because of this very issue. I suppose the new failures are related to the
> > (quite recent) fix for <section> tags in XHTML, that's the only
> XHTML-only
> > change in my branch (plus a few things in XML that are shared). I'd
> > appreciate at least a list of tests that fail, if that's possible :)!
>
> Here they are.
>

Thanks! I just updated my XHTML commit (new hash: da199f74), and it solves
the issue for many documents on my side. Do the tests fare better?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lyx.org/pipermail/lyx-devel/attachments/20200913/6ea6b0c8/attachment.html>