DocBook v2

[Kornel Benko]

Am Tue, 1 Sep 2020 11:49:25 +0200
schrieb Pavel Sanda <sanda at lyx.org>:

> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 06:27:52PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > If I see similar changes in the code I can check again, but I still
> > > think that having the codebase for others in master is at the moment
> > > more valuable than clean docbook tests, which might not be even correct
> > > from the perspective of the second rewrite.  
> > 
> > That's a fair point. If we run the ctests on the branch and only see
> > regressions in the docbook exports, I would be OK with merging.  
> 
> Great :) I understood you offered to run those tests.
> What is the result?
> 
> Pavel

Just to be clear, ATM it is not compilable on linux. Therefore no tests
on this platform yet.

	Kornel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.lyx.org/pipermail/lyx-devel/attachments/20200901/c896a42b/attachment.asc>