LyX 2.4.0dev Testing Release

[Scott Kostyshak]

On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 06:53:34PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Sun, 25 Oct 2020 13:48:15 -0400
> schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skostysh at lyx.org>:
> 
> > On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 04:55:52PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > > Am Sun, 25 Oct 2020 11:42:26 -0400
> > > schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck <rikiheck at lyx.org>:
> > >   
> > > > > Committed at 2dbf3515.
> > > > >
> > > > > Is there more?    
> > > > 
> > > > Should I try rebuilding?
> > > > 
> > > > Is there a cmake way to generate the tarballs? I use 'make dist' from
> > > > autotools.
> > > > 
> > > > Speaking of which, 'make lyxdist' used to work but doesn't now.
> > > > 
> > > > Riki  
> > > 
> > > If you do
> > >  $ make help
> > > in the build dir, you should get all possible targets.
> > > Among them
> > >  $ make package_source
> > > should create LyX-2.4.tar.gz and LyX-2.4.tar.xz  
> > 
> > Not sure if necessary, but in "cmake" call, you might need to set
> > 
> >   -DLYX_CPACK=ON -DCPACK_SOURCE_TGZ:BOOL=ON
> > 
> > Note that you can also create a .rpm. Not sure what your setup is, but
> > Kornel and I find it useful to use .debs (easy to install and remove).
> > To have "make package" create a .rpm, in "cmake" call do the following:
> > 
> >   -DLYX_CPACK=ON -DCPACK_BINARY_RPM:BOOL=ON
> > 
> > Scott
> 
> Yes, and the target is 'package', e.g.
>   $ make package

Good point. To be clear (to Riki), "make package" will make CPack's
binary packages, which in the above example is the RPM. But for the
source tar.gz file, you still do "make package_source" as Kornel
mentioned earlier.

Scott
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.lyx.org/pipermail/lyx-devel/attachments/20201025/4fa006d6/attachment.asc>