Refactoring patches

[Richard Kimberly Heck]

On 10/19/20 5:54 AM, Yuriy Skalko wrote:
>> If I looked at the correct patch (I do not follow this thread very closely), things like int const & should definitely be removed from the sources. If they did compile correctly, then I see no harm in replacing them by 'int' in declarations and 'int const' in implementation of non trivial functions.
>>
>> So the patch is fine with me.
>>
>> JMarc
> Thanks. I've committed the patch.

Well done. This cleanup is very much worth it, I think.

Is it worth a note in Developers.lyx about this? I.e., don't use const 
in declarations with built-in types?

Riki