Refactoring patches

[Richard Kimberly Heck]

On 10/13/20 1:52 PM, José Abílio Matos wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, October 13, 2020 4:40:51 PM WEST Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>
> > Suggestion: Let's see if we can get people on different platforms and
>
> > with different compilers to try the patch. As has already been said, we
>
> > do occasionally run into cases where includes are needed sometimes but
>
> > not others.
>
> >
>
> > Me: Fedora 31, gcc 9.3.1, all is well.
>
> >
>
> > Riki
>
>
> I will be picky :-) -- SCNR as a mathematician -- but the important
> part is not the compiler but the standard lib used.
>
>
> I had this epiphany because I had initially compiled with gcc 10.2.1
> in Fedora 33, it worked, and then I repeated the same procedure with
> clang 11.
>
>
> Before the compilation was over I knew that, excluding any compiler
> bug, the result should be the same since in Fedora both gcc and clang
> use libstdc++ (the GNU Standard C++ Library) in Fedora. The results
> could differ with clang and libc++.
>
>
> Since Yuriy is using apple's clang this is covered (at least for the
> current libc++).
>
Probably could use a report on Windows, then. Or Yuriy could commit and
see if anyone complains...

Riki


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lyx.org/pipermail/lyx-devel/attachments/20201013/de3e7a5f/attachment.html>