[PATCH] Add override specifier
Richard Kimberly Heck
rikiheck at lyx.org
Wed Oct 7 00:00:36 UTC 2020
On 10/6/20 5:29 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 11:04:55PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Le 05/10/2020 ?? 19:27, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
>>>> PS: yes, a proper fix will be eventually required, but I do not really
>>>> know what we should do.
>>> I'm actually not sure why the assignment operator is made unavailable,
>>> but attached is a suitable patch, I think.
>> It looks reasonable, but I really do not know why we have to do this. I
>> hoped there was some nice idiomatic C++11 magic that would get us out of
>> this mess. Adding this code feels like going 10 years backwards.
> I don't have clang here, but what would happen if we deleted
> void operator=(InsetTableCell const &);
> in the first place?
It wouldn't be awful, but we do not want to allow assignments to these
things. That's why that's there, and undefined.
Riki
More information about the lyx-devel
mailing list