Patches
Richard Kimberly Heck
rikiheck at lyx.org
Mon Nov 2 21:56:17 UTC 2020
On 11/2/20 2:33 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 02/11/2020 à 19:50, Yuriy Skalko a écrit :
>
>> I'll check this stuff. By the way, is it related to numbered layouts
>> that Daniel is now implementing on the bugtracker
>> (https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/12010)? I don't inadvertently want
>> to break his results.
>
> Yes it is related, but it should not break things in a painful way.
No, I wouldn't think so, either.
I have been thinking just a bit about this and wonder how plausible it
is to separate out those elements of the Counter class that are
per-Buffer (or, at least, document set) and those that are not.
Basically: ALL of the members of Counter are per-Buffer. The ones
associated with values obviously are. But so are e.g. labelstring_ and
prettyformat_, since these can be over-ridden by local layouts, modules,
etc. So I'm not sure there will be anything left if we factor out the
non-per-Buffer stuff.
Riki
>
>> Now I've done some profiling and is interested looking into
>> `updateMacros` that is one of the execution hotspots.
>
> Yes, updateMacros is a pain, it is actually a O(n^2) algorithm which
> kills performance for big documents. But it is a bit scary and I never
> dared changing it :)
>
> JMarc
More information about the lyx-devel
mailing list