New DocBook support (0002)

[Thibaut Cuvelier]

On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 23:03, Pavel Sanda <sanda at lyx.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 06:56:04PM +0200, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote:

Given the number and size I would appreciate if we could stick to few
> technicalities, which
> were little chaotic in the previous exchange and would become even worse
> with larger thread.
> - please try bottom post with your replies, leaving only relevant parts of
> previous emails (e.g. questions you directly reply to).
> - put your answer as a reply to an email where it was asked not to some
> different subthread
> - to reduce your burden, when we discuss patch X, you don't have to send
> and rebase all patches X+1,X+2 and so on, just updating patch X in your
> reply is enough.
>

I'll keep these in mind. (I'm not really used to mailing lists…) Is this
answer better in these regards?


> * 0001 is trivial, now in. I haven't seen any makefile entries, so these
> autotests won't be distributed with tarballs. I do not know whether this is
> what you want.
>

I didn't know that anything was required to get them in tarballs… As for
the other tests, I guess it would not make sense not to include them.


> * 0002 - you remove checkDocBook() call, yet the code of the function
> remains. Is it still needed?
>

Basically, this function should be replaced by True, so it can be safely
removed.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lyx.org/pipermail/lyx-devel/attachments/20200626/67a6a715/attachment.html>