Bug in Lyx 1.3.4 ?
st.witt at gmx.net
Thu Feb 6 17:37:43 UTC 2020
Am 06.02.2020 um 15:58 schrieb Enrico Forestieri <forenr at lyx.org>:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 01:52:15PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 08:15:45AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
>>> Am 06.02.2020 um 01:02 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck <rikiheck at lyx.org>:
>>>> I assume this is an old bug? Or is it a new one?
>>> I can reproduce something similar with 2.4.0 too. But I cannot reproduce with 2.2.4.
>> I can confirm it with Qt5 now.
>> Bisect leads to:
>> commit a2d181905a95b3bb983dac60f3d9603413a01f34
>> Author: Enrico Forestieri <forenr at lyx.org>
>> Date: Tue Jun 25 22:23:51 2019 +0200
>> Fix bug #11586
>> Do not replace a latex command with the corresponding symbol
>> in the unicodesymbols file unless it can be encoded in the
>> document encoding.
> That commit simply exposes the bug, which is the fact that the buffer
> member is not initialized. I think the patch by Stephan is correct.
That leads me to the question if there are more occurrences of this problem.
E.g. with 2.3.x in InsetMathMacro::attachArguments() the line
d->expanded_ = MathData();
could be better
d->expanded_ = MathData(d->definition_.buffer());
But in fact I don’t know if it is that simple pattern.
More information about the lyx-devel