LyX 2.3.4 Windows Installer for Testing

Pavel Sanda sanda at
Wed Feb 5 12:05:28 UTC 2020

On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 10:24:12AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > So instead of reporting missing dependency we would need to ask for
> > restructuring the packaging, which is I am afraid too long shot.
> >
> Why not? I mean, this packaging structure is plain stupid.

I don't have really opinion about this, knowing very little about texlive
packaging, I don't even understand why is all-language-related-stuff into
single package stupid, hence I won't be able to explain myself to packagers
either :)

What I see now is it that they would need to create babel-related subdependency
for each language or break their one language - one package concept and make
all babel stuff single package. I don't expect that either of those proposals
would be met with enthusiasm...


More information about the lyx-devel mailing list