Interesting read about final stable release
José Abílio Matos
jamatos at lyx.org
Sat Dec 28 14:27:52 UTC 2019
On Saturday, 13 July 2019 15.52.03 WET Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> [sorry for sending incomplete message earlier]
> We requested recently that LyX be updated to 2.1.5 in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS,
> since this branch is stuck with LyX 2.1 anyway. Version 18.04 LTS has
> already been updated to 2.2.4 recently.
It took a long time to me to answer that.
From the Zen of python:
python -m this
"Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules.
Although practicality beats purity."
We do it because it is practical.
The change mentioned have been tested in the next stable series, in that case
2.1.5 was only released after 2.2.0 was released.
Not only that but IIRC we never had any significant bug in the previous code.
> However the first answer for 16.04 is negative, and I cannot say that I
> disagree completely...
> Issues mentioned:
> * big lyx2lyx update: what testing can we show to make sure that we dio
> not break anything?
In the particular case of lyx2lyx I compare the output that comes from
converting different manual, like the User Guide.
> * big boost update: at the time it looked like a good idea, but was it?
The new release has probably has other fixes.
> * lack of comprehensive tests. We have a few unit tests, and also tests
> for export, tex2lyx. Do we have real lyx2lyx tests? What do we test
> * basically, cherry-picking a few fixes would be more effective.
> I let you read, tell me what you think, beyond the "2.1.5 on ubuntu
> 16.04" issue.
In summary I disagree strongly that "basically, cherry-picking a few fixes
would be more effective". The maintenance of other projects disproves that
More information about the lyx-devel