DocBook v2

Kornel Benko kornel at lyx.org
Sat Sep 12 14:28:08 UTC 2020


Am Sat, 12 Sep 2020 16:07:39 +0200
schrieb Thibaut Cuvelier <tcuvelier at lyx.org>:

> On Sat, 12 Sep 2020 at 07:38, Scott Kostyshak <skostysh at lyx.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 02:04:31PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >
> > > >> By the way, what would you prefer I do in this
> > > > > case where I'm not sure the fix is correct? Since we're on a branch,
> > I
> > > > > just committed so that way the tests work for me and Kornel (who I
> > > > > imagine is also affected by this configure issue). But if you prefer
> > I
> > > > > post the patch to the list instead of pushing, that's fine too. In my
> > > > > opinion, since it's your branch you should choose the workflow.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >  I have no problem with you pushing commits onto that branch. Just make
> > > > sure to send the hash on the list, in case I make one force push too
> > many
> > > > :).
> > >
> > > Sounds good! I will try to remember to always specify the hash (please
> > > let me know if I forget).
> >
> > I just pushed commit 7dc72ef3, which cherry-picked a commit from master
> > that fixes a path in an ru example file. After this, all docbook tests
> > pass for me.
> >
> > I get a lot of failures from the xhtml tests. I think most of these
> > failures are due to xmllint not being happy. I can give you the log that
> > has these errors (and xmllint output) if that would be helpful.
> > Otherwise, would it just be better to disable xmllint checking in the
> > tests for now? If not, it seems we will have a lot of test failures and
> > it will be difficult to catch more serious regressions (e.g., crashes).
> > That said, I don't know anything about this stuff so whatever you and
> > Kornel prefer is fine with me.
> >
> 
> Kornel (in CC) said somewhere else he'd prefer to wait before merging
> because of this very issue. I suppose the new failures are related to the
> (quite recent) fix for <section> tags in XHTML, that's the only XHTML-only
> change in my branch (plus a few things in XML that are shared). I'd
> appreciate at least a list of tests that fail, if that's possible :)!

Here they are.

	Kornel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ,x
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 6637 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.lyx.org/pipermail/lyx-devel/attachments/20200912/e5fe4673/attachment-0001.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.lyx.org/pipermail/lyx-devel/attachments/20200912/e5fe4673/attachment-0001.asc>


More information about the lyx-devel mailing list