Searching reports

[racoon]

On 2020-04-19 19:33, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> On 4/19/20 1:27 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Am 19.04.2020 um 17:42 schrieb racoon <xracoonx at gmx.de>:
>>> On 2020-04-19 17:22, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>>>> On 4/19/20 6:47 AM, Daniel wrote:
>>>>> Seemingly reasonable searches in the general search field in trac
>>>>> fail. For example, I was searching for an author name, a word in the
>>>>> summary, and the component name: "racoon spacing mathed"
>>>>> (https://www.lyx.org/trac/search?q=racoon+spacing+mathed). However, it
>>>>> did not return a result even though the combination of these exists
>>>>> (https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/11845). Removing the component name,
>>>>> kind of solved the problem.
>>>> If you want to search for a component name, you need to use an Custom
>>>> Query and add the component combo box. Same for author. That gives:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://www.lyx.org/trac/query?summary=~spacing&component=mathed&reporter=~racoon
>>>>
>>>> which returns #11845 and #11827. (The tilde means 'contains'.)
>>>>
>>>> By the way, since you have so many bug reports, you might want to set up
>>>> a custom page to track them, as I have here:
>>>>
>>>>      https://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/HomeRikiHeck
>>>>
>>>> (Learned this trick from Vincent.) You just start by going to e.g.:
>>>>
>>>>      https://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/HomeRacoon
>>>>
>>>> and then you can create and edit the page. Look at the code for mine, or
>>>>
>>>>      https://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/BugTrackerHome
>>>>
>>>> to see how to do it.
>>>>
>>>> Riki
>>> Thanks. My example was a bit too simple. The problem with the custom
>>> query is that the summary is only searched for the exact sequence of
>>> words. That's why I started using the general search field. I don't
>>> think that it is worth doing much about it as long as one is aware of
>>> the limitations.
>> You may choose the summary field more than once in search conditions.
>> In that case it’s combined with OR.
>
> Yes, but I think he wants it combined with AND. You can't get that
> effect in 0.12.x, at least.

Yes, I actually wanted AND. In search engines one just types several
words and they are automatically combined with AND. If one wants
furthermore to match a specific order of words one can use quotation
marks. That seems to be working in the general search field but not in
the custom search.

Daniel