[LyX/master] Try again to fix memory leak reported by Scott.
Richard Kimberly Heck
rikiheck at lyx.org
Sun Feb 23 21:37:56 UTC 2020
commit 0daceae649f9cf5633f06bb350f3309838a0a55f
Author: Richard Kimberly Heck <rikiheck at lyx.org>
Date: Sun Feb 23 16:39:00 2020 -0500
Try again to fix memory leak reported by Scott.
This time, use a shared_ptr.
---
src/Buffer.cpp | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
src/Buffer.h | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/Buffer.cpp b/src/Buffer.cpp
index eb65e81..d78b5f4 100644
--- a/src/Buffer.cpp
+++ b/src/Buffer.cpp
@@ -154,7 +154,8 @@ typedef vector<LabelInfo> LabelCache;
typedef map<docstring, Buffer::References> RefCache;
// A storehouse for the cloned buffers.
-std::list<CloneList *> cloned_buffers;
+typedef list<CloneList_ptr> CloneStore;
+CloneStore cloned_buffers;
} // namespace
@@ -371,7 +372,7 @@ public:
/// This one is useful for preview detached in a thread.
Buffer const * cloned_buffer_;
///
- CloneList * clone_list_;
+ CloneList_ptr clone_list_;
/// are we in the process of exporting this buffer?
mutable bool doing_export;
@@ -530,8 +531,8 @@ Buffer::~Buffer()
// loop over children
for (auto const & p : d->children_positions) {
Buffer * child = const_cast<Buffer *>(p.first);
- if (d->clone_list_->erase(child))
- delete child;
+ if (d->clone_list_->erase(child))
+ delete child;
}
// if we're the master buffer, then we should get rid of the list
// of clones
@@ -540,14 +541,15 @@ Buffer::~Buffer()
// children still has a reference to this list. But we will try to
// continue, rather than shut down.
LATTEST(d->clone_list_->empty());
- list<CloneList *>::iterator it =
+ // The clone list itself is empty, but it's still referenced in our list
+ // of clones. So let's find it and remove it.
+ CloneStore::iterator it =
find(cloned_buffers.begin(), cloned_buffers.end(), d->clone_list_);
if (it == cloned_buffers.end()) {
// We will leak in this case, but it is safe to continue.
LATTEST(false);
} else
cloned_buffers.erase(it);
- delete d->clone_list_;
}
// FIXME Do we really need to do this right before we delete d?
// clear references to children in macro tables
@@ -594,8 +596,8 @@ Buffer::~Buffer()
Buffer * Buffer::cloneWithChildren() const
{
BufferMap bufmap;
- cloned_buffers.push_back(new CloneList);
- CloneList * clones = cloned_buffers.back();
+ cloned_buffers.push_back(CloneList_ptr(new CloneList));
+ CloneList_ptr clones = cloned_buffers.back();
cloneWithChildren(bufmap, clones);
@@ -608,7 +610,7 @@ Buffer * Buffer::cloneWithChildren() const
}
-void Buffer::cloneWithChildren(BufferMap & bufmap, CloneList * clones) const
+void Buffer::cloneWithChildren(BufferMap & bufmap, CloneList_ptr clones) const
{
// have we already been cloned?
if (bufmap.find(this) != bufmap.end())
@@ -658,8 +660,8 @@ void Buffer::cloneWithChildren(BufferMap & bufmap, CloneList * clones) const
Buffer * Buffer::cloneBufferOnly() const {
- cloned_buffers.push_back(new CloneList);
- CloneList * clones = cloned_buffers.back();
+ cloned_buffers.push_back(CloneList_ptr(new CloneList));
+ CloneList_ptr clones = cloned_buffers.back();
Buffer * buffer_clone = new Buffer(fileName().absFileName(), false, this);
// The clone needs its own DocumentClass, since running updateBuffer() will
diff --git a/src/Buffer.h b/src/Buffer.h
index 04e9d60..4d27ec3 100644
--- a/src/Buffer.h
+++ b/src/Buffer.h
@@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ class Buffer;
typedef std::list<Buffer *> ListOfBuffers;
/// a list of Buffers we cloned
typedef std::set<Buffer *> CloneList;
+typedef std::shared_ptr<CloneList> CloneList_ptr;
/** The buffer object.
@@ -231,7 +232,7 @@ private:
///
typedef std::map<Buffer const *, Buffer *> BufferMap;
///
- void cloneWithChildren(BufferMap &, CloneList *) const;
+ void cloneWithChildren(BufferMap &, CloneList_ptr) const;
/// save checksum of the given file.
void saveCheckSum() const;
/// read a new file
More information about the lyx-cvs
mailing list